<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Useless Mathematicians?</title>
	<link>http://blog.cheesefingers.com/2007/03/20/useless-mathematicians/</link>
	<description>Practical thoughts fueled by divine orange powder</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 01:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Dev</title>
		<link>http://blog.cheesefingers.com/2007/03/20/useless-mathematicians/#comment-744</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 02:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.cheesefingers.com/2007/03/20/useless-mathematicians/#comment-744</guid>
					<description>If the solution of E8 ends up being significant, it will be a surprise to everyone, including the people who solved it.

I didn't really want to make this a battle between fields, but more about emphasis within fields.  If the medical field discovered a solvent that can grow fingernails at a rapid pace while mathematicians created an algorithm that improved the crash efficiency of automobiles, then the argument would have been turned around.

There came a time for both parties mentioned in this entry to choose a problem to attack.  It appears to me that the mathematicians chose E8 because it was hard but feasibly solvable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the solution of E8 ends up being significant, it will be a surprise to everyone, including the people who solved it.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t really want to make this a battle between fields, but more about emphasis within fields.  If the medical field discovered a solvent that can grow fingernails at a rapid pace while mathematicians created an algorithm that improved the crash efficiency of automobiles, then the argument would have been turned around.</p>
<p>There came a time for both parties mentioned in this entry to choose a problem to attack.  It appears to me that the mathematicians chose E8 because it was hard but feasibly solvable.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Richa</title>
		<link>http://blog.cheesefingers.com/2007/03/20/useless-mathematicians/#comment-739</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.cheesefingers.com/2007/03/20/useless-mathematicians/#comment-739</guid>
					<description>I'm going to have to disagree with you on this.  The entire point of research and development is not to solve real-life problems, but to extend human knowledge and to foster innovation.  To solve the problems we &lt;em&gt;don't know we have&lt;/em&gt;.  Moreover, there's no saying that solving E8 will not have an important real-life application a few years down the road, if it doesn't already.  

There are plenty of intelligent minds trained in the proper fields working on solving real-world problems, whether or not they have something to show for it.  What would really be useless is throwing a bunch of mathematicians at a medical issue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going to have to disagree with you on this.  The entire point of research and development is not to solve real-life problems, but to extend human knowledge and to foster innovation.  To solve the problems we <em>don&#8217;t know we have</em>.  Moreover, there&#8217;s no saying that solving E8 will not have an important real-life application a few years down the road, if it doesn&#8217;t already.  </p>
<p>There are plenty of intelligent minds trained in the proper fields working on solving real-world problems, whether or not they have something to show for it.  What would really be useless is throwing a bunch of mathematicians at a medical issue.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
